In this case, our client was charged with Driving While Intoxicated despite the absence of any breath or blood alcohol testing. The prosecution relied almost entirely on the arresting officer’s subjective interpretation of field sobriety tests and alleged behavioral indicators.
Our defense team conducted a thorough review of the traffic stop, the officer’s training, and the administration of sobriety tests. During trial, we demonstrated that the tests were improperly conducted and that environmental conditions affected performance. We also highlighted inconsistencies between the officer’s report and body camera footage.
Through effective cross-examination and expert-level analysis, we established reasonable doubt regarding intoxication. The jury returned a unanimous Not Guilty verdict, protecting our client from criminal penalties, license suspension, and long-term reputational harm.
