This DWI prosecution was based on alleged impairment without chemical testing. The State relied on officer testimony and circumstantial observations.
Our attorneys meticulously examined the timeline of events, the justification for the stop, and the officer’s credibility. During trial, we exposed weaknesses in the investigation and highlighted the lack of objective evidence.
By demonstrating alternative explanations for the client’s behavior and challenging the reliability of field sobriety testing, we convinced the jury that the State failed to meet its burden. The result was a complete acquittal and preservation of the client’s driving privileges and criminal record.
